W Nowym Jorku zakazali kupowania Coca-Coli

[Deleted member 427]

Jeden z najbogatszych ludzi na kuli ziemskiej, multimiliarder Michael Bloomberg, podpisał papierek, na mocy którego zakazane będzie kupowanie bezalkoholowych napojów typu Coca-Cola w większych pojemnikach niż 16 uncji, czyli coś w okolicach 0,5 litra. Dotyczy to także restauracji i sklepów!

On Thursday the New York City Health Department became the first in the nation to ban the sale of sugared beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, mobile food carts, sports arenas and movie theaters.

Jest to oczywiście część kampanii mającej na celu zwalczanie otyłości i promowanie zdrowego trybu życia.

Goodbye, Big Soda: New York Becomes First City to Ban Large-Sized Soft Drinks

Wolny kraj. Jak chuj.

​

​

 

[Nene]

A nie było czasem już o tym tematu?

 

[Deleted member 427]

Nie kojarzę. Z drugiej strony już tyle rzeczy zakazali w Nowym Jorku, że być może tracisz rachubę Tak jak powiedział Mel Gibson w "Edge of Darkness", wręczając chłopakowi broń:

-It's illegal in Massachusetts.
Gibson: Everything's illegal in Massachusetts.

 

[Szynka]

News z przed pół roku, też coś kojarzę. I co, faktycznie nie moża kupić tam litrowej coli? Ma ktoś znajomego w NY?

 

[Matrix]

Przyczyną otyłości w USA jest zwyczaj jedzenia na mieście, nie chce się przygotowywać posiłków w domu, lepiej kupić tanią bułę z mięsem plus cola, dobrze, że u nas to się tak aż bardzo nie rozpowszechniło.

 

[Nene]

Wiele dzieci w Polsce jest otyłych, bo je babcie futrują. Trzeba zutylizować wszystkie babcie

 

[crack]

Kiedyś mieli prohibicję alkoholową, a teraz mają prohibicję Coca-Colową. Na alkohol też już mają ograniczenia ?
A ten Bloooomberg niech zdycha.

 

[Cngelx]

Przyczyną otyłości w USA jest zwyczaj jedzenia na mieście, nie chce się przygotowywać posiłków w domu, lepiej kupić tanią bułę z mięsem plus cola, dobrze, że u nas to się tak aż bardzo nie rozpowszechniło.

Mi też się nie chce przygotowywać posiłków w domu. Właściwie to szkoda mi czasu i energii na takie coś, raczej jednak nie gustuje w tanich bułach z mięsem. Preferuję za to dania kuchni azjatyckiej, zwłaszcza południowo-wschodniej.

 

[Zbyszek_Z]

A ja gustuję w fast-foodach oraz niezdrowych napojach gazowanych, które piję każdego dnia i niech się urzędasy o swoje dupsko martwią a od innych ludzi się odpierdolą.

 

[decha_131]

Przyczyną otyłości w USA jest zwyczaj jedzenia na mieście, nie chce się przygotowywać posiłków w domu, lepiej kupić tanią bułę z mięsem plus cola, dobrze, że u nas to się tak aż bardzo nie rozpowszechniło.

Bardziej wolnorynkowe wyjaśnienie otyłości tutaj:
http://blog.heritage.org/2013/01/02...er&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning+Bell

 

[father Tucker]

Było. Tutaj.
https://libertarianizm.net/threads/duża-cola-w-nowym-jorku-zakazana.3461/
Kaw, nie mnóż tematów

 

[tosiabunio]

Judge Halts New York City Soda Ban

 

[Mad.lock]

Było. Tutaj.
https://libertarianizm.net/threads/duża-cola-w-nowym-jorku-zakazana.3461/
Kaw, nie mnóż tematów

Najpierw zakazali dużej a teraz i małej. Metoda małych kroków, dziwki! (Nie wiem o co chodzi z tym dodawaniem "dziwek" na końcu takich zdań, ale jest to śmieszne).

 

[Deleted member 427]

Judge Halts New York City Soda Ban

Sędzia Milton Tingling będzie miał krew na rękach - każdy dzień wolnego, nieregulowanego, puszczonego na żywioł dostępu do high capacity soda drinks oznacza kolejne ofiary, których można by uniknąć, stosując Racjonalną Politykę Kontrolną. Dziwko!

 

[crack]

http://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-ze-s...k-nie-moze-zakazac-duzych-napojow,311414.html

 

[tosiabunio]

Sędzia Andrzej zapodaje:

What if a dictator in America used the force of law to tell you what to eat? What if the same dictator told you what to drink? What if the dictator told you the sizes of the containers in which you could purchase a lawful beverage? What if the dictator just made up the rules according to his own personal taste? What if the product he regulated was lawful, sold nearly everywhere and consumed by nearly everyone? What if that product came in flavors and degrees of sweetness the dictator didn’t like? What if that product was part of a huge national market that provides choices to consumers and jobs for those who want them? What if that product was simple soda pop?

What if the dictator declared that you could consume all the soda pop you wish to consume, but you need to purchase it in small containers? What if the enforcement of this container-size rule raised the price of soda pop? What if the container size was just something the dictator dreamed up? What if the dictator believed his judgment was superior to yours with respect to deciding what you should drink and how you should drink it?

What if the dictator pretended his container-size restrictions were based on sound science? What if he hired and appointed medical personnel who feared for their jobs if they did not agree with him? What if he ordered those people to support his container-size regulations whether or not they agreed that this is the proper role of government? What if he constituted these medical lackeys into a Board of Health? What if the Board of Health pretended it seriously studied the detrimental effect of sugar-based soda pop on human beings but never did?

What if the rules for container size were written in secret? What if those rules were so complicated that a judge concluded they would be impossible to enforce? What if the rules only applied to certain sugar-based drinks, such as soda pop and coffee, but not to others, such as chocolate milk and alcohol? What if the rules only applied to some stores and shops but not to all? What if the rules were so ridiculous that in order to buy a cup of coffee larger than 16 ounces, they required you to put milk and flavoring and sugar in yourself, and the seller of the coffee could not lawfully help you or do so for you, even at your request?

What if under the fundamental law of the land the dictator was not authorized by law to write laws but only to enforce them? What if the dictator knew that the governing body elected by the people to write laws would never write the laws he wanted because its members like power and fear losing it, which could happen if they try to tell the voters who elected them how to live? What if the dictator never presented his proposals on sugar-based drinks to the elected governing body because he knew they’d be rejected?

What if the dictator was more interested in his own legacy as a reformer than in personal liberty in a free society? What if he believed he could write any law and regulate any event because his knowledge of human behavior and unintended consequences was superior to that of the people he swore to serve?

What if the same dictator once made campaign contributions to members of the governing board so that they would change the fundamental law of the land – which only the people directly can lawfully change – so as to let the dictator stay in office longer than the fundamental law permitted? What if that law could only be changed by the voters themselves, but the dictator persuaded the lawmakers to take his campaign cash and change the fundamental law for him? What if the dictator was very unpopular but continued to impose his will on the people because he desperately wanted a legacy?

What if some people who sell soda pop challenged the dictator in a court he did not control? What if a judge of that court told the people they could buy soda and coffee in whatever sizes it was sold because the dictator did not have the power to regulate their intake of liquids? What if the judge even recognized that there are areas of human behavior immune to regulation by the government?

What if all of this really happened? What if this is not a fable but a fair recounting of life today in America’s biggest city? What is the state of human freedom in New York City when the mayor can tell people what soft drinks to consume and how to consume them and the voters let him do it? What will they let the government do to us next?