Krótkie podsumowanie wielkiego bailoutu 2008/2009 w USA

D

Deleted member 427

Guest
Podobne info czytałem niedawno na blogu Gajowego:

http://marucha.wordpress.com/2011/10/03 ... n-dolarow/

A najśmieszniejszy fragment tego twojego linka, to ten:

Kongres, który zgodził się zaangażowanie jeszcze większych pieniędzy w celu zapobiegania następnemu załamaniu finansowemu, nie znał szczegółów największej w historii USA finansowej pomocy dla banków.

Bo co my tutaj mamy:

1. mamy Kongres, który godzi się na angażowanie pieniędzy podatników (albo ich dodruk) celem ratowania banków - śmierć
2. mamy Kongres, który aby zapobiec następnemu załamaniu, postępuje dokładnie na odwrót niż powinien, tj. pompuje pieniądze/pożycza/dotuje/bailoutuje/stymuluje - śmierć
3. mamy kongresmenów, którzy nie znają szczegółów działania Fedu - śmierć (za nieczytanie Rothbarda)

3xśmierć
 
D

Deleted member 427

Guest
Wszystkie dane zawarte w podlinkowanych wyżej artach mogą być mocno przesadzone - najprawdopodobniej zostały błędnie odczytane z dokumentu sporządzonego podczas audytu. Komuś wyraźnie zależy na demonizowaniu całej sprawy. Oto odpowiedź, jaką znalazłem w sieci:

You are misrepresenting what the audit stated. For anyone who is interested, the audit report can be found at:

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf

There was nothing secret about the Federal Reserve's extraordinary lending programs. Each of the programs were discussed in detail in the 2008, 2009, and 2010 annual reports to Congress. Amounts that were outstanding in each program are listed on the Fed's balance sheet and were shown on the weekly H.4.1 statistical release which are all public information. For example, here is the statistical release from March 5, 2009:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20090305/

Also, there were news reports from the period that specifically covered several of the extraordinary lending programs. Yup, it was so secret that it was announced in the media:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/busin ... Ehm1JiRB9Q
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2008/03 ... 78831.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/10/ ... AK20081008

and I can provide dozens of others.

Second, there was never $16 trillion in loans outstanding. Most of the extraordinary lending were for loans that matured overnight to address temporary liquidity issues. Also, most the extraordinary lending programs required adequate collateral from the borrower. Almost all of the extraordinary programs have now ended and all loans made under those programs were repaid, on-time, and with interest. Of course, you would know that if you had actually read the report.

All of the lending programs established minimum interest rates and the terms of the loans. The Primary Dealer Credit Facility only made overnight loans and the interest varied from as low as 0.5% to 3.25%. The Term Auction Facility made loans for 28-day and 84-day periods. The interest rate for those loans varied from 0.25% to 4.65%.

As for loans to foreign banks and corporations, the law governing the Federal Reserve specifically allows those types of transactions. If Senator Sanders wants to complain about those transactions, he should probably read the law first. It wasn't that the Federal Reserve did something it wasn't supposed to do. It did exactly what was allowed by law. Since Congress wrote and enacted that law, it was Congress that allowed those transactions to happen.
See 12 USC 347c and 12 USC 347d

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/12/us ... c000-.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/12/us ... d000-.html
Kliknij aby rozwinąć...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 422AAB98vg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Do góry Bottom